Does the application of Universal Design principles improve accessibility of classroom learning resources?

By Andrea DiStefano & Tom Kelly, City of London Boys School

What is the problem?

  • We are aware that classroom learning resources
    (and worksheets) often have issues with accessibility.
  • Over 11% of pupils experience some form of visual
    processing or other accessibility obstacle.
  • Teachers do not always know the strategies or
    techniques that enhance accessibility.
  • A greater awareness of the difficulties some
    pupils experience is necessary to inform resource design.
  • There are simple strategies and techniques
    teachers can learn which would make their resources more accessible.

Research and testing methodology

Studies
and recommendations by professional bodies on designing for dyslexia and other
visual processing were consulted. General accessibility best practices and
principles of effective universal design were researched.

To
test our theories we picked a cross-section of subjects and age groups (4
total). For each of the four groups, we observed 2 of their lessons and
surveyed the pupils.

Teachers
were asked to submit slides and handouts for a future lesson. We redesigned
them, applying some of the principles we’d learnt. We refer to this
processing as ‘pimping’ the resources.

The teachers were then invited to trial our ‘pimped’ resources, and we observed these used in lessons to obtain further feedback. Examples can be seen below.

Observations

  • Resources are
    sometimes made using existing content – textbooks, websites, etc, and
    are often not reformatted for accessibility.
  • Content was
    sometimes shrunk or squished to fit the boundaries of the page/screen, rather
    than presented in a clear and accessible format.

Findings

  • a Sans
    Serif
    typeface (eg Calibri, Arial)
  • a slightly larger font size (between
    11–14pt)
  • increased
    line-spacing
    (approx. 1.3
    lines)
  • a line length
    of no more than ~15 words
  • never use
    BLOCK CAPS
    , and
  • always avoid
    using justified text
    .

Our survey also revealed that pupils find it easier to read text with…

  • 90% of pupils experienced difficulties filling in worksheets. Problems included spacing, structure, pages shrunk to fit
    exercise books.
  • 70% of pupils admitted formatting of resources sometimes affected
    their understanding.
    These
    included poor photocopying, text too small, badly organised.
  • 82% of pupils preferred Sans-serif fonts as being the most readable.
  • 100% of pupils found the ‘pimped’ slides easier to follow and
    understand.
  • 83% of pupils found the ‘pimped’ worksheets easier to
    use/complete.
  • 73% of pupils found generous line spacing made text easier to
    read.

Conclusions

The
accessibility and design of learning resources is restricted by 3 key
factors
:

  • time constraints
  • lack of technical IT skills
  • the lack of accessibility understanding/awareness

Awareness and training

  • Teachers need better awareness and training in accessibility,
    including best practices for ‘remixing’ content taken from different sources.

Guidance and support

  • Wherever
    possible, text should be presented in a sans-serif font, at a comfortable size
    (based on reading distance), and with generous line spacing.
  • Teachers
    should have access to templates (and ‘snippets’) for a variety of worksheet
    styles and types

Help for teachers

  • Provide
    teachers with a few basic principles to follow should enable them to design
    resources that are more accessible for all boys.
  • Publish clear
    guidance on accessible typography, use of colour, iconography and page layout/
    formatting.
  • Provide
    templates, which include a pre-prepared range of ‘snippets’, designed by Tom
  • A follow-up
    research project later this year?

Postscript – one year later…

We
are carrying on this year – attending department meetings and offering bespoke solutions
for each group.  This year has seen a significant positive change to the
way the Biology department curate their resources, thanks to the two years of
work we have done.  Our estimates of slow, steady uptake are pretty
accurate so far, and I would anticipate that we will see further change if we
persevere with outreach.